Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law

SKU: 9781760022426
Regular price $215.00
Unit price
per
  • Author:
    CHORDIA Shipra
  • ISBN:
    9781760022426
  • Publication Date:
    September 2020
  • Edition:
    1
  • Pages:
    272
  • Binding:
    Hardback
  • Publisher:
    Federation Press
  • Country of Publication:
Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law
Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law

Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law

SKU: 9781760022426
Regular price $215.00
Unit price
per
  • Author:
    CHORDIA Shipra
  • ISBN:
    9781760022426
  • Publication Date:
    September 2020
  • Edition:
    1
  • Pages:
    272
  • Binding:
    Hardback
  • Publisher:
    Federation Press
  • Country of Publication:

Description

Selected as the winner of the 2019 Holt Prize by The Hon Professor William Gummow AC, The Hon Justice Alan Robertson and Ruth Higgins SC, Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law considers the concerns that have been raised regarding the doctrine of proportionality and how these might be addressed. Since its first introduction into Australian constitutional law, there have been debates regarding its use. Recent cases, in particular, have seen a splintering on the High Court, with some judges expressing support for proportionality as a useful tool in certain contexts, and others expressing deep reservations about it. Against this background, Chordia proposes a theoretical framework for proportionality, and uses it to explore a critical question: when, if at all, is proportionality an appropriate analytical tool in Australian constitutional adjudication?

(0 in cart)
Shipping calculated at checkout.

You may also like

This is a Sample Product Title
Was $200.00 Now $100.00
  • Selected as the winner of the 2019 Holt Prize by The Hon Professor William Gummow AC, The Hon Justice Alan Robertson and Ruth Higgins SC, Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law considers the concerns that have been raised regarding the doctrine of proportionality and how these might be addressed. Since its first introduction into Australian constitutional law, there have been debates regarding its use. Recent cases, in particular, have seen a splintering on the High Court, with some judges expressing support for proportionality as a useful tool in certain contexts, and others expressing deep reservations about it. Against this background, Chordia proposes a theoretical framework for proportionality, and uses it to explore a critical question: when, if at all, is proportionality an appropriate analytical tool in Australian constitutional adjudication?

Selected as the winner of the 2019 Holt Prize by The Hon Professor William Gummow AC, The Hon Justice Alan Robertson and Ruth Higgins SC, Proportionality in Australian Constitutional Law considers the concerns that have been raised regarding the doctrine of proportionality and how these might be addressed. Since its first introduction into Australian constitutional law, there have been debates regarding its use. Recent cases, in particular, have seen a splintering on the High Court, with some judges expressing support for proportionality as a useful tool in certain contexts, and others expressing deep reservations about it. Against this background, Chordia proposes a theoretical framework for proportionality, and uses it to explore a critical question: when, if at all, is proportionality an appropriate analytical tool in Australian constitutional adjudication?